Essay
The case for social friction
Solo focus apps fight a battle that distraction has already won. The unit of attention isn't the individual — it's the room.
There are, by our last count, several hundred apps that will block your phone for you. Most of them work. None of them work for long.
The problem isn't technical. The problem is that focus, in 2025, is rarely a private decision. You sit down to read, your partner is on their phone, and within three minutes you're checking yours too — not because you wanted to, but because the room shifted.
Distraction is a group dynamic
This is the premise behind GoOffline. We treat distraction the way it actually behaves: as a contagion that moves through the social graph faster than any individual can resist.
So instead of locking one phone, GoOffline locks a room. Six-character code, three taps, everyone in. The friction is social — leaving the session means leaving the group, visibly. Most people, it turns out, don't.
Less willpower, more peer pressure
We're aware "peer pressure as a feature" is an unusual pitch. But the alternative — heroic individual willpower against a multi-billion-dollar attention economy — has been tried, and it has lost.
The good news: when the room agrees to be present, almost no willpower is required at all.
Keep reading
More from the Journal
What we're working on next
A short note on the studio's next quarter — and the through-line tying our apps together.
Why we built MeditWait
The scrolling problem isn't a willpower problem. It's a starting-state problem — and a few quiet minutes can change the entire trajectory of an evening.